(817) 778-9532

U.S. Helium Content by Field & Province

A first-party reference dataset of helium concentration across the major and emerging U.S. helium provinces — what the gas runs, where, and whether it comes from producing hydrocarbon gas or non-hydrocarbon (nitrogen/CO2) accumulations.

Data as of June 28, 2026 · CSV · JSON · License CC BY 4.0 · DOI

Sell Helium Mineral Rights

TL;DR A first-party reference dataset of helium concentration (% of gas) by U.S. field and province — Hugoton–Panhandle, LaBarge, Four Corners, plus emerging plays in Montana, Colorado, Arizona, and Minnesota. With CSV/JSON exports, CC BY 4.0.

Helium is produced as a component of natural gas, and its commercial value tracks concentration. Gas with roughly 0.3% helium or more is generally rich enough to justify extraction; the richest U.S. fields run several percent, and a handful of emerging non-hydrocarbon plays test well into the double digits. This table compiles published helium-concentration figures by field so mineral owners can see where their acreage sits — and which fields make a helium component worth pursuing.

Quick reference

This dataset catalogs 16 U.S. helium fields and provinces across 10 states. Published concentrations range from a fraction of a percent in established byproduct fields up to roughly 14.5% helium in the highest-grade emerging plays. The commercial threshold is generally around 0.3%.

Helium concentration by U.S. field

Helium % is the published concentration in the produced gas and varies within a field. "byproduct" = helium separated from produced hydrocarbon gas; "non-hydrocarbon" = helium from nitrogen- or CO2-rich gas.

Field / Province States Core counties Helium % Gas type Status
Hugoton Gas Field KS, OK, TX Stevens, Grant, Haskell, Seward, Morton, Finney, Kearny (KS) 0.3–1.8% byproduct Producing
Panoma Field KS Southwest Kansas (overlies Hugoton) ~0.3–1% byproduct Producing
Texas Panhandle Field TX Potter, Moore, Hartley, Hutchinson, Carson, Gray 0.1–1.3% byproduct Producing
Cliffside Field (Bush Dome) TX Potter storage reservoir byproduct Storage / former reserve
Keyes Field OK Cimarron commercial byproduct Producing
Petrolia Oilfield TX Clay historic byproduct Depleted (historic)
LaBarge / Riley Ridge (Shute Creek) WY Sublette, Lincoln helium in ~65% CO2 gas byproduct Producing
Paradox Basin (Lisbon, Doe Canyon, Harley Dome) CO, UT Montezuma, Dolores, San Juan (CO); Grand, San Juan (UT) up to ~7% (Harley Dome) byproduct Producing
San Juan Basin NM NW New Mexico 0.3–0.5% byproduct Producing
Greater Natural Buttes (Uinta Basin) UT Uintah commercial byproduct Producing
Holbrook Basin (Pinta Dome, Navajo Springs) AZ Apache, Navajo up to ~8–10% (Pinta Dome, historic) non-hydrocarbon Producing / prospecting
Piceance Basin CO Western Colorado commercial byproduct Producing
Topaz Project (Pulsar Helium) MN Near the Iron Range 8–14.5% non-hydrocarbon Appraisal / development
Sweetgrass Arch / Kevin Dome MT Toole, Hill, Liberty commercial non-hydrocarbon Producing / developing
Sagebrush Project (Quantum Helium) CO Paradox Basin (BIA-administered minerals) ~2.76% non-hydrocarbon Appraisal
Galactica / Pegasus (Blue Star Helium) CO Las Animas commercial non-hydrocarbon Developing

How to read this dataset

Concentration is the value driver. A field that produces large gas volumes at 0.1% helium can be worth less, per unit of helium, than a smaller field running 1%+. The richest established byproduct fields sit on the updip edges of the Hugoton–Panhandle complex; the highest grades anywhere are in emerging non-hydrocarbon plays.

Byproduct vs. non-hydrocarbon matters for your interest. In a producing hydrocarbon field, a helium component usually rides along with your existing oil & gas royalty. In a non-hydrocarbon helium play, the gas may be almost entirely helium, nitrogen, or CO2 — a different leasing and royalty conversation.

Status signals timing. Producing fields generate royalty now; appraisal and development plays are forward-looking — value depends on whether and when a project advances.

Methodology & sources

Figures are compiled from public regulatory and industry records — including U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) helium commodity data and the Minerals Yearbook, state geological surveys and oil & gas regulators, and operator disclosures and technical reports. Helium concentration is reported as published ranges because it varies across a field and between formations. This is a curated secondary compilation provided for reference; it is not a primary measurement series. When citing, attribute "Buckhead Energy" and include the as-of date (June 28, 2026).

Machine-readable exports: CSV and JSON. This dataset is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license — reuse with attribution.

Cite this dataset

Permanently archived and citable via a DOI on Zenodo (CERN), under a CC BY 4.0 license. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21442884  ·  View on Zenodo

Citation (plain text)
BibTeX (machine-readable)

License & attribution: This data is licensed CC BY 4.0. You are free to share and adapt it, including commercially, provided you credit “Buckhead Energy” and link back to this page or the DOI above.

Embed this dataset

Add this table to any web page. It stays in sync as the data is refreshed and includes attribution back to Buckhead Energy (CC BY 4.0) — free to use.

Live preview:

Own minerals in a helium-bearing field?

Buckhead Energy buys oil, gas, and mineral interests directly — including acreage in helium-producing and emerging helium provinces. Get a free, no-obligation written offer based on your specific tract and interest.

Get a Free Offer

Direct buyer, not a broker · no commissions · A+ BBB rated · buying since 2007

Related

This page is educational and not legal, tax, or financial advice. Helium concentrations are published estimates that vary within a field; verify against current operator and regulatory data for any specific tract. Consult a qualified attorney or CPA for your situation.